Non-exempt employees in Nevada who have been misclassified as exempt may be missing out on wage and hour protections guaranteed by the FLSA (Fair Labor Standards Act), including:
Most blue collar employees who are paid hourly wages qualify as non-exempt, whereas most white collar employees who are salaried are exempt. Misclassified non-exempt employees have various legal options, including:
Depending on the case, misclassified employees may be able to recover:
The primary distinction between exempt and non-exempt employees is that exempt employees are unprotected by state and federal wage and hour laws. Protections that apply only to non-exempt employees in Nevada include:
In most cases, Nevada law mirrors federal law regarding what jobs qualify as exempt and which do not. As discussed below, white-collar workers are usually exempt while blue-collar and clerical workers are generally non-exempt. 1
Non-exempt employees generally comprise “blue-collar workers.” Many non-exempt employees are paid on an hourly basis, but some can be salaried. Common examples of workers that are usually non-exempt include:
Exempt employees generally comprise “white collar” workers and employees who are paid a salary (though some can be paid hourly). The five main categories of exemption include:
Note that “highly compensated employees” who make at least $107,432 a year and independent contractors are also exempt. 3
Exempt executive employees typically meet the following conditions:
Examples of executives may include senior vice presidents of a business or a newspaper editor-in-chief. 4
Exempt administrative employees typically meet the following conditions:
In short, administrative workers support a business. They often work in the following departments:
Under federal law, exempt professional employees typically meet the following conditions:
In short, professionals require advanced education or training. Examples include:
Unlike federal law, Nevada specifies that employees may also be exempt if they are licensed or certified as certain professions even if their salary is less than $844 a week. Some of these exempt professions include:
Exempt outside sales employees typically meet the following two conditions:
Exempt computer professionals typically meet the following three requirements:
Employers are required to classify their employees as either exempt or non-exempt for payroll and tax purposes. Sometimes employers innocently misclassify their non-exempt employees as exempt due to a clerical error or misunderstanding of the law. But other times, the misclassification is on purpose because they want to save money.
Employers often prefer to have exempt employees instead of non-exempt employees. One reason is that exempt employees are not entitled to “time and a half” overtime pay and other protections, such as minimum wage, half-hour lunch breaks, and paid rest breaks.
Furthermore, non-exempt employees often cause more paperwork: Non-exempt employees often have to keep timesheets so employers can calculate how many hours of work to pay for and whether the employee worked any overtime.
Employers who misclassify non-exempt employees as exempt — whether by accident or on purpose — face serious tax penalties as well as lawsuits by the Department of Labor or misclassified employees. As discussed below, employers may be forced to pay out much more money than they save from misclassifying their employees.
Employees who are misclassified as exempt are encouraged to talk with their employer (or whichever department controls payroll). If the employer inadvertently made a mistake, the employer can correct the error with the IRS and pay the employees any back wages they may be due.
But if the employer refuses to comply with the employee’s “good faith effort” to rectify the situation, the employee can consider filing a claim with the Nevada Labor Commissioner or bringing a lawsuit.
Misclassified employees can seek the help of the Nevada Labor Commissioner by completing a claim form online (not through email or fax). If possible, the employees should attach any supporting documentation that helps to prove that they are in fact non-exempt. Examples may include:
The Commission may then investigate the matter — which can include holding a hearing similar to a small-scale trial. If the Commission finds in the employee’s favor, it can issue a binding order to the employer to correct the employee classification and to pay any back pay the employee may be due.
Note that the Commissioner looks back only two (2) years prior to the date of the claim. Therefore, employees who were misclassified for more than two years could receive back pay for only the prior two years. 10
Also note that employees may prefer to file a wage claim not with the Nevada Commissioner but with the U.S. Department of Labor instead. An experienced labor law attorney would help a misclassified employee decide where would be best to file a claim.
Another route misclassified employees can take is suing the employer in civil court. Although this option is more complicated, may take longer, and almost certainly requires an attorney, it can reap a lot more benefits. Potential “causes of action” may include (among others):
In many cases, there is more than one employee of a particular company who has been misclassified. The benefit of having multiple misclassified employees is that they may be able to join forces and bring a class-action lawsuit against the employer. Employers are more likely to take class action lawsuits seriously than other lawsuits because of the scale.
The four threshold prerequisites that plaintiffs (the misclassified employees) must demonstrate before a judge will recognize a class action lawsuit are the following:
Similar to filing a claim with the Labor Commissioner, lawsuits have statutes of limitations. Therefore, employees are encouraged to retain legal counsel as soon as they learn that they may have been misclassified.
Furthermore, the court can order that the employer pay liquidated damages. These damages are equal to the amount of the employee’s unpaid back wages plus interest. In other words, employees may be able to win double damages. 13